Home “AI Developments Should Be Paused for Six Months”: AI Ethicists

“AI Developments Should Be Paused for Six Months”: AI Ethicists

Krishi Chowdhary Journalist Author expertise
In our content, we occasionally include affiliate links. Should you click on these links, we may earn a commission, though this incurs no additional cost to you. Your use of this website signifies your acceptance of our terms and conditions as well as our privacy policy.

“AI Developments Should Be Paused for Half-a Year”: AI Ethicists

On March 28th, 2023, a group of acclaimed ethicists published a letter from the Future of Life Institute, pleading for a six-month moratorium on AI development projects. Signed by more than 2000 people, the petition claims that the emerging AI models pose numerous future threats attributable to the misuse of technology. 

Advocates believe that the proposed pause on developing advanced AI models will help prevent a “loss of control of our civilization.”

Well-known figures like Turing award winner Yoshua Benigo, Elon Musk, and the US entrepreneur Steve Wozniak have chosen to participate in the campaign by signing the said open letter earlier this week.

Besides the open letter protest, much more is happening around this AI vibe. Prominent names like Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMiillan, and Emily M. Bender have started working together at the DAIR Institute.

They are conducting new research that aims to analyze and expose AI-associated harms. Gebru and the team are known for their controversial action of criticizing the abilities of AI, which made them lose their jobs at Google.

The Researcher’s Take

The names of Gebru, Angelina, and Emily were not on the signatory list. In fact, they have strongly criticized the open letter campaign as they believe it doesn’t relate well with the ground-level problem associated with the future of technology and development. The trio solely believes that the harms from so-called AI development are true and prevailing. They may promote exploitative labor practices.

However, according to Gebru, Angelina, and Emily, the debated letter has failed to establish and exhibit a connection between AI development and technology threats.

While they have supported several recommendations in the letter, which they proposed earlier in 2021 in the PR-reviewed paper called ‘Stochastic Parrots,’ they are not ready to stand with the overshadowed and fear-mongering AI hype. Scientists believe that this irrational hype may drive an imparity between human competitive intelligence and powerful digital minds. 

They have not signed the petition because it doesn’t address these artificial intelligence systems’ practical and ongoing harms.

The letter, according to the trio, talks about a number of hypothetical risks which have been imagined based on a killing ideology – longtermism. The said ideology somehow overlooks the actual harms and talks about illogical consequences.

The said harms include huge data theft and worker exploitation to create products profitable for a handful of entities. Besides, these systems may lead to the explosion of synthetic media, which may later reproduce systems of operation, endangering the entire information ecosystem. Gebru and the other two also believe that the consequences of the AI system development may create social inequities by handing over the power to a select group of people.

The Same Aim

Whether it is a fantasized AI-induced utopia or an apocalypse exhibiting a potentially catastrophic future, the “Future of Life Institute petition” has seemingly taken the tech world by storm. It’s being presented as a solid protest against the ongoing trials of inflating the capabilities of automated systems.

While the opinions of the petition signatories and team Gebru don’t align well, both parties’ goals seem identical.

They aim to enforce transparency and remove the potential threats to technology and society triggered by the bird-brained development of AI.

Krishi Chowdhary Journalist

Krishi Chowdhary Journalist

Krishi is an eager Tech Journalist and content writer for both B2B and B2C, with a focus on making the process of purchasing software easier for businesses and enhancing their online presence and SEO. Krishi has a special skill set in writing about technology news, creating educational content on customer relationship management (CRM) software, and recommending project management tools that can help small businesses increase their revenue. Alongside his writing and blogging work, Krishi's other hobbies include studying the financial markets and cricket.

Latest News

Cisco Launches AI-Driven Security Solution 'Hypershield'

Cisco Launches AI-Driven Security Solution ‘Hypershield’

Crypto analyst April top picks
Crypto News

Crypto Analyst Reveals His Top Three Investments for April

Popular crypto analyst Andre Outberg has revealed his top three crypto investments for April. One of them is a brand-new GameFi/GambleFi Solana project that has gained popularity recently. Outberg is...

You May Soon Have to Pay to Tweet on X, Hints Musk

You May Soon Have to Pay to Tweet on X, Hints Musk

Elon Musk has said that Twitter may charge new users a fee to allow them to tweet and interact on X. This is being done to fight the long-standing bot...

Pakistan Interior Ministry Bans X Over Security Concerns

Pakistan Bans X over Security Concerns – But The Ban Might Be Temporary

Colorado’s New Law Aims To Protect Consumer’s Brainwave Data

Colorado’s One-of-a-Kind Law Aims to Protect Consumer’s Brainwave Data

Samsung's $44 billion investment in chipmaking in the US

Samsung’s $44 Billion Investment in Chipmaking in the US

AMD Releases New Processors for AI-Powered PCs

AMD Releases New Processors for AI-Powered PCs