Home Dr. Damage asks: integrated audio vs. PCI?
News

Dr. Damage asks: integrated audio vs. PCI?

Scott Wasson Former Editor-in-Chief Author expertise
Disclosure
Disclosure
In our content, we occasionally include affiliate links. Should you click on these links, we may earn a commission, though this incurs no additional cost to you. Your use of this website signifies your acceptance of our terms and conditions as well as our privacy policy.

Ok, I have read darn near everywhere that the integrated AC’97 audio in Via chipset south bridge chips is inferior to a PCI card solution like a SoundBlaster Live! The reasons cited are almost always the same: higher CPU use with integrated audio, and lower sound quality. Such declarations are a hardware web site staple. I’m sure I’ve written about it myself.

But I have seen little in the way of proof.

As with many things, such as the SCSI vs. IDE debate, this issue seems clouded by a certain amount of prejudice and snobbery. Of course add-in cards are better, the PC enthusiast’s mind tells him. But setting aside the issue of 3D positional audio in games—which, frankly, with SBLive! cards has never impressed me in the least—is there a substantial advantage to PCI card audio solutions?

The motherboards with integrated audio I’ve used have varied with respect to audio quality. Some had more bus noise than others. But so do PCI cards. And the very best on-board sound I’ve heard has no audible bus noise and a clean sound, overall. Many fairly nice sound cards nowadays are just AC’97 chips coupled to DSPs, after all, aren’t they?

And, to filter out the junk, I’m asking for proof. Post a link to some real benchmarks, either for general use or for 3D positional audio in gaming. Show me some technical whitepapers explaining the difference, and back them up with proof that using that DSP is appreciably better than using a few clock cycles on my 1.5GHz Athlon.

Or are we just all pressing the lever to get the Creative-branded pellet out of habit?

The Tech Report - Editorial ProcessOur Editorial Process

The Tech Report editorial policy is centered on providing helpful, accurate content that offers real value to our readers. We only work with experienced writers who have specific knowledge in the topics they cover, including latest developments in technology, online privacy, cryptocurrencies, software, and more. Our editorial policy ensures that each topic is researched and curated by our in-house editors. We maintain rigorous journalistic standards, and every article is 100% written by real authors.

Scott Wasson Former Editor-in-Chief

Scott Wasson Former Editor-in-Chief

Scott Wasson is a veteran in the tech industry and the former Editor-in-Chief at Tech Report. With a laser focus on tech product reviews, Wasson's expertise shines in evaluating CPUs and graphics cards, and much more.