Toshiba’s Nile-powered Satellite T235D notebook

Manufacturer Toshiba
Model Satellite T235D-S1345
Price (Street)
$599.99
Availability Now

AMD has always fought an uphill battle to make a name for itself in notebooks. Even at Intel’s darkest hour, when Pentium 4s were getting a well-deserved whupping from the Athlon 64 series, the excellent Pentium Ms reigned supreme among early thin-and-light laptops. Intel widened its lead again with its Atom and Consumer Ultra-Low Voltage offerings, which have given us previously unheard-of combinations of power-efficiency and affordability.

The tide is slowly turning, though. In May of this year, AMD announced its biggest mobile launch to date: 135 systems from all of the big names in the industry—Acer, Asus, Dell, HP, Lenovo, MSI, and Toshiba—adopted its new Nile and Danube platforms. According to the latest figures from IDC, AMD’s paltry notebook market share became slightly less paltry last quarter, as well, climbing from just over 12% to almost 14%.

Toshiba’s Satellite T235D-S1345 is one of the 135 newcomers—part of the fresh onslaught of AMD champions out to prove themselves against Intel’s finest. Toshiba has based this 13.3″ ultraportable on the 2010 AMD Ultrathin Platform, also known as Nile, outfitting it with a dual-core Turion II Neo processor, Radeon HD 4225 integrated graphics, and a suitably slim chassis. At least on paper, the T235D compares favorably to similarly priced CULV designs, especially when you look at the integrated graphics.

We’ll be putting the T235D through the paces to see whether AMD finally has a serious challenger to the Intel CULV family. Is Nile the slam-dunk AMD needs? And should the T235D itself be on your shopping list this back-to-school season?

From Congo to Nile: a change of pace

Over the past couple of years, AMD’s ultrathin efforts have taken it from the great white north to an African safari. Yukon, the company’s first stab at the concept, managed to beat Atom netbooks on graphics and CPU performance while retaining very attractive pricing. However, as we found, those perks came at the cost of notably poor battery life. Later, the Congo platform added dual cores and DirectX 10-class integrated graphics, but sluggish and power-hungry 65-nm processors continued to be a handicap—and by that point, AMD was competing against not just netbooks, but Intel CULV ultraportables, as well.

Nile is a much bigger step forward than Congo. It brings together DirectX 10.1 integrated graphics, CPUs based on a 45-nm fabrication process, DDR3 memory support, HyperTransport 3.0, and AMD’s latest south bridge. The chart below, which we nabbed from an AMD PowerPoint slide, shows how those additions affect power efficiency:

Internal AMD tests suggest Nile delivers 22% better clock-for-clock CPU performance and 36% higher 3DMark06 scores than Congo, so the greater power efficiency goes hand-in-hand with greater speed. Sounds like a winning combination.

There’s not a whole lot of special sauce here, mind you. Nile is more or less a mobile version of AMD’s entry-level desktop platform. The Turion II Neo X2 processor in the Toshiba T235D features a Geneva chip, which is the notebook equivalent of Regor, the silicon inside Athlon II X2 desktop processors. That means two cores, no L3 cache, and a DDR3 memory controller, all in a die measuring about 117 mm². Similarly, Nile’s RS880 chipset can be found in 880G desktop motherboards like the Asus M4A88TD-M. The mere fact that AMD is using the latest tools in its toolbox is good news, though, since Congo’s 65-nm CPUs were really starting to grow long in the tooth.

Although the Toshiba T235D is a prime example of Nile in action, AMD’s current branding strategy makes it a tad difficult to find other Nile-based notebooks out in stores. Unlike the elaborate dual-logo stickers that adorned Yukon systems, this Nile machine has a single AMD sticker with a Vision Premium logo much like the one we saw on Congo-based systems. The difference, AMD tells us, is a subtle one: “spotlights” in the red backdrop that set Vision 2010 notebooks apart.

AMD’s definitions for the various Vision labels remain uncannily vague, too:

Were this not a Vision Premium notebook, we would apparently be unable to use a webcam, convert CDs to MP3s, or do basic photo editing. Interesting. I must have an overactive imagination, since I distinctly remember doing all of those things on comparatively antiquated home PCs a decade ago.

In all seriousness, rallying all of AMD’s assets under a single, distinctive banner is probably a good thing. Not long ago, the Centrino label did a similar job of unifying different Intel sub-brands into one platform. It’s just a shame you may have to pull up spec sheets to make sure you’re not getting a Congo laptop with last-gen tech. Keep your eyes peeled for Nile-specific processor names (that’s the Turion II Neo K600 series, Athlon II Neo K325 and K125, and V series V105) and Radeon HD 4200-series integrated graphics

With all that platform talk out of the way, we should take a closer look at the true star of our review: Toshiba’s T235D.

The T235D in the flesh

As someone who still considers 13″ notebooks to offer the best blend of portability and functionality, I immediately saw a lot to like in the T235D. Weighing less than four pounds and measuring only 0.7″ at its thinnest point, this system feels more grown-up but nearly as svelte as its sub-12″ ultraportable brethren. Here, the larger form factor gets you not just a bigger LCD panel, but also a larger keyboard and touchpad.

Internally, the T235D ticks all the right boxes, too. Our review sample is the T235D-S1345 model, which packs a 1.5GHz dual-core Turion II Neo, four gigs of DDR3 RAM, and Windows 7 Home Premium x64. Toshiba largely didn’t skimp on bells and whistles, either:

Processor AMD Turion II Neo K625 1.5GHz
Memory 4GB DDR3-800 (2 DIMMs)
Chipset AMD M880G
Graphics Mobility Radeon HD 4225 integrated graphics
Display 13.3″ TFT with WXGA (1366×768) resolution and LED backlight
Storage Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB 2.5″ 5,400 RPM hard drive
Audio Stereo HD audio via Realtek codec
Ports 2 USB 2.0

1 eSATA/USB 2.0 combo port

1 HDMI

1 VGA

1 RJ45 10/100 Ethernet via Realtek controller

1 analog headphone output

1 analog microphone input

Expansion slots
1 MMC/SDHC
Communications 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi via Atheros AR9285
Input devices Chiclet keyboard

Synaptics capacitive touchpad

Internal microphone

Camera 0.3-megapixel webcam
Dimensions 12.7″ x 8.8″ x 0.7-1.03″ (323 x 224 x 18-26 mm)
Weight 3.9 lbs (1.8 kg)
Battery 6-cell Li-Ion (61 Wh)

Yes, there’s even a powered eSATA port that doubles as a USB port. The only notable omission here is Bluetooth—a disappointing one, especially since the front of the chassis has an LED spot specially reserved for Bluetooth activity. Toshiba omitted an optical drive, too, but those are very rare on ultraportables in general. And let’s face it: when was the last time you had to load up something from an old CD or DVD?

This particular variant of the T235D sells for $599.99 at Newegg. The cheapest 13″ laptops with Intel CULV processors, like Acer’s Aspire AS3810TZ or Toshiba’s own T235-S1310, are priced almost identically at around $590-600. Looks like AMD is up in the big leagues, gettin’ its turn at bat. Think of the T235D’s price tag as a flashing banner with the words, “Nile notebooks are just as good or better than CULV notebooks.” We’ve included a slightly more upscale sibling of the AS3810TZ in our comparison today, so we’ll be putting that implied claim to the test.

Aesthetics are subjective, of course, but I can’t say I hate the look of the thing. Jeez, though. Could Toshiba have put any more stickers on the palm rest? I count not one, not two, not three, but four stickers attesting to the system’s eco-friendliness. There’s even a sticker advertising Skype “voice & video calling” near the power button, for goodness’ sake.

Toshiba hasn’t escaped the temptation to give the T235D’s top lid a glossy finish, either. The dark tones and textured patterns should help conceal smudges and fingerprints to some extent, but don’t seek the solace of brushed aluminum or bamboo here.

In my book, the T235D gets a pass on its aesthetic faux-pas for its delightfully compact build. Note the comparison shot above, with the system propped on top of my 13″ aluminum MacBook. While the Toshiba does look thicker overall, note how thin the lower portion of the machine is by comparison, especially near the front. In everyday use, those dimensions make the T235D feel much tighter and more portable.

My only real grievance here is with the power plug. Just look at that thing. It’s huge! The solid part protrudes almost two inches to the left of the laptop, just begging to get snagged onto something when you’re sitting on the couch. At least couch use won’t be further impeded by neutering heat. The T235D stays relatively cool when it’s not under a particularly strenuous load, with the fan exhaust rarely blowing out air much hotter than room temperature.

The display and the controls

We’ve already talked a little bit about the Toshiba T235D’s display, keyboard, and touchpad, but let’s go into more detail. After all, those are components you’re pretty much stuck with, as is the case with any laptop. The human-interface components have to be good, or using the system is going to feel like a chore.

Let’s start with the display. The T235D has a TN panel with a 16:9 aspect ratio, a 1366×768 resolution, and LED backlighting, so it resembles pretty much all of the newer laptop screens out there in those respects. 13 inches happens to be a pretty good size for that resolution—any larger, and I tend to get frustrated that the manufacturer didn’t throw in a higher-res panel. Any smaller, and pixels can feel a little too tiny. This particular display really could be of higher quality, however. Vertical viewing angles are poor, contrast isn’t great, and luminosity really should be higher—especially considering the glossy finish, which impedes use in brightly lit environments. Also, looking at the panel up close shows dark vertical lines between pixel columns, which gives the image a sort of weaved look, like fabric. It’s a little strange and not terribly pleasant to look at.

I suppose one’s expectations shouldn’t be too high when shopping for a laptop in this price range. This display isn’t particularly terrible, relatively speaking, but it certainly doesn’t stand out from the swaths of mediocre TN panels. That’s really too bad.

If the display gets you down, you need only look a few inches down to be cheered up again. The T235D has an excellent little chiclet keyboard with crisp, clicky keys painted with a semi-glossy silver finish. The keys themselves may look small, but their relative size means nice, wide gaps between them, which in turn helps set your fingers in place and prevent typos. Some laptop makers have taken to using chiclet keyboards with very wide keys and small gaps, which I find much less comfortable to use.

The 13″ form factor means no compromises as far as the non-alpha keys go, so you should really have no trouble doing real work on this thing. Toshiba gets points for its attention to detail, too, like with the LED light on the caps-lock key itself, how you can hit FN-ESC to mute, or the large CTRL key, which ensures you (probably) won’t hit FN by accident when trying to cut and paste something.

Speaking of FN, holding down that key brings up a heads-up display of sorts with a list of functions and the FN+key combinations that activate them. You can even use your mouse to click on the tiles instead of completing the keystroke. That’s a brilliant touch, since having to stare down at tiny symbols etched on F-keys can be headache, especially in a dark room or airplane cabin. Toshiba loses points for not having a heads-up display for volume control, though. The only way to be sure you’ve set the volume right is to try playing back something.

  Total keyboard area Alpha keys
  Width Height Area Width Height Rough area
Size 294 mm 97 mm 28,440 mm² 167 mm 49 mm 8,203 mm²
Versus full size 102% 88% 90% 97% 86% 84%

Compared to our reference, non-chiclet keyboard, the T235D’s keyboard appears to have almost the same alpha key width, but with a wee bit less height. Out of pure curiosity, I compared the surface areas of the T235D’s alpha keys and those of my Apple desktop keyboard. It turns out the Toshiba has about 94% of the Apple keyboard’s alpha-key area, which really isn’t that small.

Moving down to the touchpad, and we have another win for Toshiba. I’ve complained endlessly about poor-quality touchpads in notebook reviews, but it’s hard to find a flaw with this one. It’s not too small; the surface has a good coefficient of friction, with very little break-in required; and the buttons curve down with the lip of the palm rest, so hitting them with one’s thumb requires no extra effort. By virtue of being a Synaptics pad, this unit provides multi-touch scrolling, pinching, and pivoting functionality, too—and I’m pleased to report the touchpad surface is smooth enough to make two-finger scrolling feel solid and reliable.

The only downside? The glossy finish on those buttons:

Come on, laptop designers. You should know the drill by now. Glossy paint attracts smudges, so don’t put it on areas the user is supposed to touch. Like the friggin’ touchpad buttons.

Connectivity and expansion

Because of its small size and slim form factor, the T235D doesn’t have too much going on in terms of connectivity. What’s there is, however, reasonably complete:

On the left side, we have the AC port, the fan exhaust vent, HDMI, eSATA/USB, and an all-in-one card reader.

On the right, Toshiba gives us 3.5-mm headphone and mic ports, a pair of USB 2.0 ports, VGA, Ethernet, and a Kensington lock slot .

Flipping the T235D on its back exposes the battery and expansion area. Freeing that six-cell battery doesn’t require too much dexterity: just pull that small right latch to unlock it, and then pull the left latch while pulling the battery toward you.

Only a single screw stands between you and the memory and storage compartment. In practice, removing that compartment door is a little scary, because it involves prying loose a myriad of little L-shaped clips with some force. I almost thought I was breaking them at one point, but no, I just had to keep pulling.

I don’t suspect most folks will be upgrading the memory, since four gigs should be plenty for an ultraportable like this one. Replacing the mechanical hard drive with an SSD might be a more worthwhile upgrade, and it shouldn’t prove too difficult. The hard drive sits in a little tray held in place by two screws, so just undo those and pull the drive horizontally to disconnect it. Put your SSD in the tray, and then just slide it back in.

Pre-installed software

Most laptops these days come with piles of pre-loaded crapware, from bloated anti-virus software trials to cheesy game demos. All that crapware can make even peppy systems feel sluggish at times. In the interest of full disclosure, we’re going to be looking more closely at these software bundles from here on out.

The Toshiba T235D-S1345 is no exception to that trend. Here’s the “Uninstall a program” control panel after its very first bootup:

Yikes!

Toshiba has its bases covered. We’ve got Norton Internet Security, Microsoft Works and a Microsoft Office trial, the Google Toolbar (wouldn’t wanna forget that one), Skype, and Quickbooks. Somewhat shockingly, the bulk of the pre-loaded software comes from Toshiba itself. I count more than two dozen entries that start with the PC maker’s name. Believe it or not, though, some of those apps can come in handy.

Take the Toshiba PC Health Monitor, which in the company’s words, “proactively monitors a number of system functions such as power consumption, battery health and system cooling.” That kind of information is probably too much for your computer-illiterate uncle, but enthusiasts should appreciate having that kind of information from the get-go. Too bad Toshiba doesn’t show the actual CPU temperature, though.

In a similar vein, Toshiba’s eco Utility lets you keep track of how much power the system is consuming. You can also switch on the power-saving “eco” mode from here and see how it impacts power consumption.

Other useful apps include the Toshiba Service Station, which looks for system updates; Toshiba Online Backup, which does exactly what it says on the tin; and Toshiba HDD Protection, which serves only to warn that “vibration has been detected in the PC” and “the hard disk drive head is temporarily moved to a safe position.” I’m not sure about the Toshiba Web Camera Application, which sets up camp permanently in an auto-hiding pane on the left of the screen and doesn’t let you do much besides tweak the facial-recognition feature and take pictures of yourself.

Some of Toshiba’s other applications are, unfortunately, much more frivolous. Take ReelTime (pictured above), a “graphical history/indexing tool that enables you to view recently accessed files in a fun and easy-to-use format.” Yeah, I don’t know who’d want to use that. The same goes for the Toshiba Bulletin Board, which lets you pin pictures, files, or notes to “visually organize [them] in a fun and creative way.” Toshiba goes so far as to pin both of those applications to the Windows taskbar. Too much, man. Too much!

Our testing methods

We’ve compared the Toshiba T235D-S1345 against a pair of netbooks, a collection of grown-up laptops, and the Eee PC 1201T, which doesn’t really fit in either category—and doesn’t ship with an operating system.

The comparison to watch out for here will be with the Acer Aspire AS3810, which is a little quicker but otherwise comparable to the $600 AS3810TZ we talked about on the first page. The 3810 we tested has a 1.4GHz Core 2 Duo, while the 3810TZ ships with a 1.3GHz dual-core Pentium.

Now for a few test notes. Asus’ default power management profile underclocks the Eee PC 1005PE and 1000HA’s Atom processors to 1.33GHz and 1.25GHz, respectively, when those netbooks are running on battery power. We tested both with this profile and the “high performance” mode, which lets CPUs scale up to their top speeds even on the battery. The Toshiba T235D and the Asus U30Jc, UL80Vt, and K42F all have special “Battery-saving” modes, too, results for which we’ve included in our battery life comparisons. We tested the UL80Vt in its “Turbo” mode, which overclocks the processor, as well. Other laptops were run in their default configurations.

With the exception of battery life, all tests were run at least three times, and their results were averaged.

System Acer Aspire AS3810-6415 Timeline Asus Eee PC 1000HA Asus Eee PC 1005PE Asus Eee PC 1201T Asus K42F Asus U30Jc Asus UL80Vt-A1 Dell Studio 14z Samsung R480 Toshiba T235D-S1435
Processor Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 1.4GHz Intel Atom N270 1.6GHz Intel Atom N450 1.66GHz AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 1.6GHz Intel Core i5-540M 2.53GHz Intel Core i3-350M 2.26GHz Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 1.3GHz Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 2.4GHz Intel Core i5-430M 2.26GHz AMD Turion II Neo K625 1.5GHz
North bridge Intel GS45 Intel 945GSE Intel NM10 Express AMD RS780MN Intel HM55 Express Intel HM55 Express Intel GS45 Nvidia GeForce 9400M G Intel HM55 Express AMD M880G
South bridge Intel ICH9M Intel ICH7M AMD ID439D Intel ICH9M AMD SB820
Memory size 4GB (2 DIMMs) 1GB (1 DIMM) 1GB (1 DIMM) 2GB (1 DIMM) 4GB (2 DIMMs) 4GB (2 DIMMs) 4GB (2 DIMMs) 3GB (2 DIMMs) 4GB (2 DIMMs) 4GB (2 DIMMs)
Memory type DDR3 SDRAM at 800MHz DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz DDR3 SDRAM at 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM at 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM at 800MHz DDR3 SDRAM at 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM at 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM at 800MHz
Memory timings 6-6-6-15 4-4-4-12 5-5-5-15 5-5-5-15 7-7-7-20 7-7-7-20 6-6-6-15 7-7-7-27 7-7-7-20 6-6-6-15
Audio Realtek codec with 6.0.1.5807 drivers Realtek codec with 6.1.7600.16385 drivers Realtek codec with 6.0.1.5948 drivers Realtek codec with 6.0.1.5948 drivers Realtek codec with 6.0.1.5939 drivers Realtek codec with 6.0.1.6029 drivers Realtek codec with 6.0.1.5898 drivers IDT codec with 6.10.0.6217 drivers Realtek codec with 6.0.1.5969 drivers Realtek codec with 6.0.1.6072 drivers
Graphics Intel GMA X4500MHD with 7.15.10.1666 drivers Intel GMA 950 with 8.15.10.1749 drivers Intel GMA 3150 with 8.14.10.1929 drivers AMD Radeon HD 3200 with 8.635.0.0 drivers Intel GMA HD with 8.15.10.1995 drivers Intel GMA HD with 8.15.10.2021 drivers Intel GMA X4500MHD with 7.15.10.1752 drivers

Nvidia GeForce G210M with 8.15.11.8688 drivers

Nvidia GeForce 9400M G with 8.15.11.8619 drivers Nvidia GeForce GT 330M with 258.96 drivers AMD Mobility Radeon HD 4225 with 8.723.2.1000 drivers
Hard drive Toshiba HDD2HD21 500GB 5,400 RPM Seagate Momentus 5400.4 160GB 5,400 RPM Seagate Momentus 5400.4 160GB 5,400 RPM Hitachi Travelstar 5K500.B 250GB 5,400 RPM Seagate Momentus 5400.6 500GB 5,400 RPM Hitachi Travelstar 5K500.B 320GB 5,400-RPM Seagate Momentus 5400.6 500GB 5,400 RPM Western Digital Scorpio Blue 320GB 5,400 RPM Seagate Momentus 5400.6 500GB 5,400 RPM Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB 5,400 RPM
Operating system Windows 7 Home Premium x64 Windows 7 Starter x86 x64 Windows 7 Starter x86 x64 Windows 7 Home Premium x86

Ubuntu Linux 10.04

Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Windows 7 Home Premium x64 Windows 7 Home Premium x64 Windows 7 Home Premium x64 Windows 7 Home Premium x86 Windows 7 Home Premium x64

We used the following versions of our test applications:

All the tests and methods we employed are publicly available and reproducible. If you have questions about our methods, hit our forums to talk with us about them.

Application performance

We’ll start off our mobile benchmark suite by looking at browser performance using FutureMark’s Peacekeeper benchmark. FutureMark says this app tests JavaScript functions commonly used on websites like YouTube, Facebook, Gmail, and others. Next, we’ll look at Flash performance using the Flash component of the GUIMark rendering benchmark.

The dual-core Turion II Neo is off to a good start in our browser tests, standing pretty much neck-and-neck with the Acer’s 1.4GHz Core 2 Duo SU9400.

What happens when we crank up the heat and step into 7-Zip’s built-in compression and decompression benchmark?

Same deal, pretty much.

Turning up the heat further with a purely CPU-intensive video encoding test yields similar results. The T235D either inches ahead of the AS3810 or shadows it. Of course, we should note that both of those offerings are well, well behind Core 2010-powered systems like the U30Jc and R480. AMD’s Turion II Neo K625 does well enough against Core 2-based CULV processors, but it’s no match for a Core i3.

Video playback

We tested video playback performance by playing the Alice in Wonderland 720p trailer, the Avatar 1080p trailer, and a standard-def DivX video in a maximized Windows Media Player window. The 720p YouTube trailer was played with Flash 10.1 in a maximized Firefox window. In each case, we kept an eye on the Task Manager and recorded the lowest and highest CPU utilization numbers.

  CPU utilization Result
Alice in Wonderland QuickTime 720p 0-9% Perfect
Avatar QuickTime 1080p 0-12% Perfect
DivX PAL SD 7-18% Perfect
720p YouTube HD windowed 4-23% Perfect

The Toshiba’s Radeon HD 4225 integrated graphics chew through even 1080p video without much effort. In this case, we actually saw higher CPU utilization when playing back our DivX clip. High-definition YouTube video is similarly smooth, presumably thanks to Flash 10.1’s support for hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback.

Battery life

Here comes Nile’s make-or-break moment. Each laptop’s battery was run down completely and recharged before each of our battery life tests. We used a 40% brightness settings on all displays except for the Aspire Timeline’s, which we cranked up to 50%. (We found the Timeline’s 50% setting more directly comparable to the 40% settings of the K42F, UL80Vt, and Studio 14z.)

For our web surfing test, we opened a Firefox window with two tabs: one for TR and another for Shacknews. These tabs were set to reload automatically every 30 seconds over Wi-Fi, and we left Bluetooth enabled on systems that include it (the T235D and U30Jc do not). Our second battery life test involves movie playback. Here, we looped a standard-definition video of the sort one might download off BitTorrent, using Windows Media Player for playback. We disabled Wi-Fi and Bluetooth across the board, too.

The bad news is that, even with a relatively meaty 61Wh battery, Nile fails to catch up to the year-old Aspire 3810 and its 56Wh battery. The good news is that Nile doesn’t fall too far behind, and it does quite a bit better than Congo, as represented by the Eee PC 1201T (which had a 47Wh battery and a single-core, 1.6GHz Athlon Neo MV-40). Toshiba’s eco power profile doesn’t help much, though—I think its impact on performance doesn’t justify the small battery life improvement.

Now, there’s still one facet of Nile we haven’t explored: gaming. CULV laptops with Intel integrated graphics are, let’s face it, basically unworkable in anything resembling a modern game. Not so for Nile and its integrated Radeon HD 4200-series graphics. Before we reach our conclusion, let’s put those graphics capabilities to the test, shall we?

Nile shows its gaming chops

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 integrated graphics in this Nile notebook aren’t exactly designed for hard-core gaming. GPU-Z reports only 40 stream processors, four ROPs, and a 382MHz core clock speed. The integrated GPU also shares 256MB of the system’s DDR3 memory. Still, that’s better than nothing. To see how far we could push this system, we tried to play a handful of PC games. We started with Gearbox’s Borderlands, which has become a staple of our mobile gaming benchmarks as of late.

If you were expecting to get your wasteland bandit-killing on with this laptop, prepare to be disappointed. Even with the resolution scaled back to 640×480 and all the detail settings turned down, the T235D could only produce frame rates in the 20-30 FPS range. We could play, but the game was just a shadow of itself.

Next, we tried Valve’s Left 4 Dead 2. The co-op zombie shooter was surprisingly playable at 1024×768 with trilinear filtering, low detail levels, and no antialiasing, film grain, or vsync. Frame rates hovered between 22 and 39 FPS, with rare drops into the teens during uniquely heavy action (or with spitter goo on-screen). For a quick, on-the-road zombie killfest with your friends, the T235D is certainly usable. Just don’t think too much about the eye candy you’re missing.

Codemasters’ DiRT 2 proved quite a bit more demanding than the Valve title. We had to drop the resolution to 800×600 and select the ultra-low detail level to get a semi-stable 24-25 FPS, at which point the game was playable but a little choppy—and quite pixelated. Not really the kind of racing experience I would recommend.

Don’t let the top-down perspective and the lack of a price tag fool you—Valve’s Alien Swarm requires a fair amount of graphics horsepower. At 1024×768 with all detail settings at their lowest, the game’s offline training level chugged along at around 14-30 FPS, with dips to as little as 10 FPS. That was more playable than you might think, since the top-down perspective means you can aim and fire without moving the camera. Still, the game felt far from smooth, especially with aliens on screen. Again, not a terribly great experience.

Discouraged by our experiences with DiRT 2 and Alien Swarm, we fired up Introversion’s Darwinia, a low-tech indie game that’s gained a cult following. Unsurprisingly, this title was perfectly smooth. In fact, the Toshiba cranked out about 40-65 FPS at 1366×768 with everything maxed out. Light indie gaming shouldn’t be a problem on this laptop.

What about older PC blockbusters? Infinity Ward’s Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare is nearing its third birthday, but it can still be a lot of fun, especially in multiplayer. We started the game’s first post-training level, which takes place on stormy seas with rain and plenty of action. With the game at 1280×720 with normal textures and models, low water detail, and all the other bells and whistles disabled, the Toshiba managed frame rates in the 20-40 FPS range, with some detours into the teens here and there. I’d call the experience fairly playable, although I wouldn’t be afraid to take the resolution down a notch to get a smoother experience in multiplayer.

Conclusions

We’ve reached the end of our journey up the Nile. Toshiba has a great little notebook here, but let’s talk briefly about AMD’s new platform first.

With Nile, I think it’s safe to say AMD has largely bridged the gap with Intel’s CULV offerings—but with a different mix of qualities. Processor performance is equivalent, graphics performance is quite a bit better, and battery life is a little bit worse. If you don’t need to stay unplugged all day, that might not sound like a bad trade-off at all, especially considering just how bad Intel’s GMA 4500HD integrated graphics really are. Being able to play Left 4 Dead 2 at all is a pretty big deal on this class of system.

Now if only AMD could deliver CULV-like power efficiency and solid integrated graphics, it would have something going. As it is, Nile is a good alternative, but not the slam-dunk some may have been hoping for.

As for the Toshiba T235D, this system’s great form factor, excellent touchpad and keyboard, and solid platform make it a very tantalizing choice for the back-to-school season. If it weren’t for the lack of Bluetooth and the lackluster display, this little laptop would have been an easy Editor’s Choice candidate. We think it still deserves a Recommended award, though, simply because few other systems manage to get so much right. You’ll just want to do some house-cleaning in the “Uninstall a program” control panel before getting to work on this thing—but what laptop couldn’t that be said about?

Comments closed
    • cavedog
    • 9 years ago

    #23 it’s not “bro” anymore. It’s called “brah”. Get with the program

    • flip-mode
    • 9 years ago

    Glossy fail; nuff said.

    • TravelMug
    • 9 years ago

    Something I noticed in laptop/notebook/netbook/nettop reviews before, but never commented on. It’s amazing how good DiRT2 and CoD4 look at the lowest settings. You don’t lose that much in the looks department. Compare this to L4D2 which looks like crap with these settings. I tried the Batman Arkham Asylum demo as well last week when people complained (rightfully I might add) that Anand only tested it on lowest settings in his SB preview. That game also does not suffer much by lowering the settings to minimum.

      • indeego
      • 9 years ago

      Source is dated, even L4D2 looked aged on release. No two ways about itg{<.<}g

    • blubje
    • 9 years ago

    “… lackluster display”

    thanks for placing emphasis on this; I always think the screen is one of the most striking features of the macbook pro’s — i.e. how much better the it is than most pc laptops (some thinkpads exempted).

      • mattthemuppet
      • 9 years ago

      you pays your money you takes your choice – comparing screens between a $1700 and a $600 laptop is like whining about how my Ford Focus is coarse and underpowered compared to a Lexus IS450. Duh, of course it is!

    • Willard
    • 9 years ago

    Awesome. Thanks for reviewing a bunch of different notebook and netbook platforms.

    • codedivine
    • 9 years ago

    Here in Canada, I havent found a K625 powered system. Most Nile based offerings here seem to be around the single core K125.

    • BoBzeBuilder
    • 9 years ago

    I was in the market for a new notebook and this looks perfect. Anyone know how I can get my hands on one? I live in Canada.

    • ronch
    • 9 years ago

    I’ve been using an Acer laptop powered by an AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58 (1.9GHz Dual Core, 512KB per core) and an Nvidia Gefore 7000M for almost three years now, and so far it’s been running well. I chose it over a sea of Intel-based notebooks simply because I always go with AMD. I only use this laptop for work, simply because, while the Turion CPU is good enough for office apps, the Nvidia 7000M is seriously crippled. Good to see today’s offerings at least give you the possibility of playing some titles at acceptable settings.

      • dragmor
      • 9 years ago

      I’m playing Alien Swarm at 1280×800 with my 2 year old HP Tablet. AMD 2.2ghz dual core, 4GB, 3200HD with 32MB sideport.

        • StuG
        • 9 years ago

        The 3200 and 4200 can do a surprising amount of light-gaming.

    • rootheday
    • 9 years ago

    How about comparing the graphics performance to an Arrandale ULV instead of last year’s Intel CULV/GMA 4500?

    • wira020
    • 9 years ago

    Thanks for the review.. This is a very good looking laptop.. not sure about the silver colored keyboard tho..I would have prefer black.. it’s seriously bloated tho…

    • TaBoVilla
    • 9 years ago

    Great review Cyril!

      • SomeOtherGeek
      • 9 years ago

      Seconded!

    • cygnus1
    • 9 years ago

    What’s with only 100m ethernet?

      • NeelyCam
      • 9 years ago

      Do you really /[

        • Skrying
        • 9 years ago

        Will it be used often? No, probably hardly at all. But to me it’s just a further indication (along with numerous other issues) of the low quality of the system.

          • cygnus1
          • 9 years ago

          agreed. when i want to transfer 50 or 100GB over to it before leaving for a trip or something, i have to remember to start transferring hours before hand, or with gigE i could transfer everything i want in 30 minutes or less.

          It’s a limitation I’ve run into with my current little athlon neo laptop. I won’t buy another laptop without gigE. There’s a pretty sizable difference between maxing out at 10MB/s vs maxing out the write capacity of the internal drive which is usually somewhere between 40 and 60MB/s. what’s the point of putting such big hard drives in laptops if it takes forever and a day to transfer anything over to it.

          the cost difference for manufacturing is so slight, it screams cheap out on the part of the manufacturer.

            • StuG
            • 9 years ago

            I 100% agree. This is probably one of the major things I find wrong with my current laptop, and will not do it again when I buy another one.

            • axeman
            • 9 years ago

            I find this is an irritation omission on lots of cheap systems. Sure most people won’t use it, and 100mbit is fine for surfing and downloading, but how much are they really saving cost wise? I mean, how many microphone jacks and eSATA ports go unused, and they’re pretty much standard… Surely they could spend a few more cents on a gigE controller over a 10/100.

            • LiamC
            • 9 years ago

            +1 as well. No GigE, no purchasie…

            And it’s funny that in a thread with 20 replies, 25% are about this one “minor” quibble. Maybe TR can let Toshiba know.

            And what’s with Radeon graphics with (G)DDR3? I would have thought that GDDR5 would be more power efficient and vastly better performance wise. Again, all for a few $$$ saved…

            • potatochobit
            • 9 years ago

            100GB?!
            Lame Sauce, bro!

            when I go on trips I always download 300GB worth of rap music to keep me going on my airplane trips.

            I mean, I never put any music on it the other 6 months I owned my laptop
            everytime I go on a trip, 300GB of rap music! Oh, yeah!

            so I just GOTZ to have an uber home network using my windows network profile to move around all my hard core kicks.
            even though my wifi cant handle it anyway, thats cool
            I’ll Just unplug my MAC from my router and plug in my laptop

          • potatochobit
          • 9 years ago

          you are totally wrong bro

          do you have a 6 foot spoiler on your honda?
          if the laptop does not need it then a laptop should not have it
          has absolutely nothing to do with ‘low quality’

            • Anonymous Coward
            • 9 years ago

            You’re annoying.

            • cygnus1
            • 9 years ago

            +1

      • Welch
      • 9 years ago

      I agree…. Gigabit isn’t expensive at all for these guys to add. I do personally use Gigabit on my laptop regardless of what you guys say. Screw plugging in an external.

      However, this notebook has to meet a competitive price envelope so I can’t blame them for cutting corners somewhere, and that is a corner most people don’t mind being shorted on…. the average user that is.

    • Duck
    • 9 years ago

    l[

      • stmok
      • 9 years ago

      You can modify a Windows ISO with Tosbiha’s loyalty OEM key and relevant OEMBIOS files…Customise your own version of an OEM install disk. I do it for ThinkPads.

      • dragmor
      • 9 years ago

      Lenovo Thinkpad laptops come with a pretty clean install as well. You even get the option when buying to include different pieces of software, office trials, etc.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This