A GK110-based GeForce?
Nvidia has done a tremendous amount of work, from the hardware to software to promotion and more, to cultivate a market for its graphics chips as data-parallel processors for use in supercomputing, HPC, and academia. GTC 2012 featured a total of 340 different sessions presented by folks from a broad range of disciplines, and virtually all of the presenters were using GPUs for something other than real-time graphics.
If your interest in GPUs was, like mine, first sparked by graphics and gaming, you might be wondering about the prospects for a GeForce card based on the GK110. Trouble is, those prospects have been dampened somewhat by Nvidia's success in other areas. The GK110 won't reach the market until the fourth quarter of 2012, and multiple folks from Nvidia forthrightly admitted to us that those chips are already sold out through the end of 2012. All of those sales are to supercomputing clusters and the like, where each chip commands a higher price than it would aboard a video card. One gentleman seated in front of us at the GK110 deep-dive session mentioned in passing that he had 15,000 of the chips on order, which was his reason for attending.
The Nvidia executives we talked with raised the possibility of a GK110-based GeForce being released this year only if necessary to counter some move by rival AMD. That almost certainly means that any GK110-based GeForce to hit the market in 2012 would come in extremely limited quantities.
Nevertheless, with the information Nvidia has revealed about the GK110 and a dash of speculation, we can paint a picture of how a GeForce card based on the big Kepler might look. Note that we're assuming a higher clock frequency for the consumer graphics card than we have for the Tesla K20. Beyond the clock speeds, which affect all of the rates, we're only guessing about a couple of graphics capabilities. Nvidia hasn't officially confirmed that the GK110 has five GPCs, although we do have the die shot. Similarly, we'd expect 48 pixels per clock of ROP throughput to accompany its six memory channels, if the GK110 retains the same arrangement as the mid-sized Kepler.
|Process node||40 nm @ TSMC||28 nm @ TSMC||28 nm @ TSMC||28 nm @ TSMC|
|Core clock||772 MHz||1006 MHz||900 MHz||925 MHz|
|Hot clock||1544 MHz||-||-||--|
|Setup rate||3088 Mtris/s||4024 Mtris/s||4500 Mtris/s||1850 Mtris/s|
|SP FMA rate||1.6 Tflops||3.1 Tflops||5.2 Tflops||3.8 Tflops|
bilinear texel rate
|49/49 Gtexels/s||129/129 Gtexels/s||216/216 Gtexels/s||118/59 Gtexels/s|
|ROP rate||37 Gpixels/s||32 Gpixels/s||43 Gpixels/s||30 Gpixels/s|
|Memory clock||4000 MT/s||6000 MT/s||6000 MT/s||5700 MT/s|
|Memory bus width||384 bits||256 bits||384 bits||384 bits|
|Memory bandwidth||192 GB/s||192 GB/s||288 GB/s||274 GB/s|
We think the GK104 has a more suitable mix of resources for real-time graphics, especially for current games that have been cross-developed for antiquated console hardware. The GK110 may be twice the size, but it's not likely to be twice as fast for gaming. Still, our theoretical GK110-based GeForce increases shader flops and texture filtering capacity by two-thirds, along with respectable improvements in ROP rate and memory bandwidth. Since the GK104 is already a match for AMD's Tahiti, we reckon the GK110 would be substantially faster still—if and when it makes it way into a consumer graphics card.
82 comments — Last by brucethemoose at 6:26 PM on 06/03/12
|Radeon Software Adrenalin Edition: an overviewA rose by any other name||27|
|AMD's Ryzen 5 2500U APU reviewedToward a more perfect fusion||166|
|Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 Ti graphics card reviewedAnything you can do, I can do better||135|
|AMD's Ryzen 7 2700U and Ryzen 5 2500U APUs revealedInfinity Fabric ties Zen and Vega together||175|
|The Tech Report System Guide: September 2017 editionHog heaven at the high end||100|
|Nvidia Quadro vDWS brings greater flexibility to virtualized pro graphicsPascal Teslas play host to Quadro virtues||2|
|AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64 and RX Vega 56 graphics cards reviewedRadeons return to the high-end graphics market||279|
|AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64 and RX Vega 56 graphics cards revealedGamers get Vegas to call their own||177|
|TR's 2017 Christmas giveaway: eight days left and counting||6|
|Rumor: Ryzen 2 set for Q1 2018 and a Fenghuang APU breaks cover||31|
|MSI gives Radeon RX Vega cards an Air Boost||20|
|Corsair's latest SO-DIMM kit takes 32 GB of DDR4 to 4000 MT/s||8|
|Report: Intel Inside co-marketing program will get a budget cut||31|
|Gingerbread House Day Shortbread||17|
|iMac Pro details and release date come into focus||49|
|Radeon Software Adrenalin Edition: an overview||27|
|Tuesday deals: NVMe storage, a GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, and more||9|
|Full disclosure: while I work for Intel; the opinions I express here are my own I think I understanding the issue you ran into. For the Braswell platf...||+36|