Single page Print

Test notes
We've tested the Venice 3800+ against a range of CPUs, including the latest dual-core processors. We've also used a lot of multithreaded applications, which may not seem fair to the single-core Athlon 64 3800+, but life is about to get very unfair indeed for single-core CPUs in the coming months and years as the industry works to use threading more extensively.

There are two comparisons to watch here. The first one is the Venice 3800+ against the older Newcastle-based 3800+. That's a pretty straightforward affair of old versus new, and it will give us a good sense of the clock-for-clock performance benefits of the Venice core. The second is the Venice 3800+ against the Pentium 4 660, Intel's single-core competition. Truth be told, the 3800+'s most direct competitor is probably the Pentium 4 650 at 3.4GHz, which lists for about $25 more than the 3800+. However, the 3800+ may well hold its own against the slightly faster and more expensive P4 660.

Also, we have included results for the Pentium D 840 in our testing, which we obtained by disabling Hyper-Threading on our Extreme Edition 840. Since the Pentium D 840 is just an Extreme Edition 840 sans HT, the numbers should be valid.

Our testing methods
As ever, we did our best to deliver clean benchmark numbers. Tests were run at least twice, and the results were averaged.

Our test systems were configured like so:

Processor Opteron 152 2.6GHz Pentium 4 660 3.6GHz
Pentium D 840 3.2GHz
Pentium Extreme Edition 840 3.2GHz
Pentium 4 Extreme Edition 3.73GHz Athlon 64 3800+ 2.4GHz (Venice)
Athlon 64 3800+ 2.4GHz (Newcastle)
Athlon 64 4000+ 2.4GHz
Athlon 64 FX-55 2.6GHz
Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 2.2GHz
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 2.4GHz
System bus 1GHz HyperTransport 800MHz (200MHz quad-pumped) 1066MHz (266MHz quad-pumped) 1GHz HyperTransport
Motherboard Tyan Thunder K8WE S2895 Intel D955XBK Intel D955XBK Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe
BIOS revision 2/21/2005 beta BK95510J.86A.1152 BK95510J.86A.1234 MCT2/dualcore
North bridge nForce4 Professional 2200
nForce4 Professional 2050
AMD 8131 PCI-X Tunnel
955X MCH 955X MCH nForce4 SLI
South bridge ICH7R ICH7R
Chipset drivers SMBus driver 4.45
IDE driver 4.75
INF Update INF Update SMBus driver 4.45
IDE driver 4.75
Memory size 2GB (4 DIMMs) 1GB (2 DIMMs) 1GB (2 DIMMs) 1GB (2 DIMMs)
Memory type OCZ PC3200 512MB registered ECC DDR SDRAM at 400MHz Corsair XMS2 5400UL DDR2 SDRAM at 533MHz Corsair XMS2 5400UL DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz Corsair XMS Pro 3200XL DDR SDRAM at 400MHz
CAS latency (CL) 3 3 4 2
RAS to CAS delay (tRCD) 3 2 2 2
RAS precharge (tRP) 3 2 2 2
Cycle time (tRAS) 8 8 8 5
Hard drive Maxtor DiamondMax 10 250GB SATA 150
Audio Integrated nForce4/AD1981B
with NVIDIA 4.60 drivers
Integrated ICH7R/STAC9221D5
with SigmaTel 5.10.4456.0 drivers
Integrated ICH7R/STAC9221D5
with SigmaTel 5.10.4456.0 drivers
Integrated nForce4/ALC850
with Realtek drivers
Graphics GeForce 6800 Ultra 256MB PCI-E with ForceWare 71.84 drivers
OS Windows XP Professional x64 Edition
OS updates -

Note that we have more total memory on the Opteron rig. I don't believe any of our benchmarks are constrained by available RAM in a 1GB system, but you'll still want to keep the difference in mind.

All tests on the Pentium systems were run with Hyper-Threading enabled, except where otherwise noted.

Thanks to Corsair and OCZ for providing us with memory for our testing. This matchup required lots of high-quality RAM, so we had to spread the love around. Both brands are far and away superior to generic, no-name memory.

Also, all of our test systems were powered by OCZ PowerStream power supply units. The PowerStream was one of our Editor's Choice winners in our latest PSU round-up.

The test systems' Windows desktops were set at 1152x864 in 32-bit color at an 85Hz screen refresh rate. Vertical refresh sync (vsync) was disabled for all tests.

We used the following versions of our test applications:

The tests and methods we employ are generally publicly available and reproducible. If you have questions about our methods, hit our forums to talk with us about them.